YOU MIGHT NEED A USDA LICENSE IF:
1) If you sell that stud fee puppy that just didn't turn out the way you
wanted-- guess what you are a third party/broker and you might need a USDA
license.
2) You already bred 2 of your bitches and there are 17 puppies on the ground and
registered. That darn bitch you co-own just had 12 puppies ---- you might need a
USDA license.
3) If you are a handler and you come back from Crufts with dogs purchased for
your clients YOU might need a USDA license.
4) If you are a handler and your clients bring their litters to you to sell YOU
might need a USDA license
5) If you are that breeder who had their handler sell your puppies, your handler
must turn you in and YOU might need a USDA license
6) If you have great lines and want to sell your dogs to another show/breeder
(even part interest) YOU might need a USDA license
7) If you don't alter your puppies before they leave and one of your pet puppies
is bred you just sold breeding stock and YOU might need a USDA license
8) If "oops" you sell an Irish Wolfhound and his new owner actually uses the
breed to hunt You just sold a hunting dog and YOU might need a USDA license
9) If you breed just one litter in a year, but decide to sell one or two of your
retired show dogs, YOU might need a USDA license.
10) If your breeding partner, who co-owns all your queen cats with you, breeds
and raises more than three litters in one year in her home and you do the same
in your home, YOU BOTH might need USDA
licenses.
11) If your popular stud dog breeds five bitches belonging to other breeders, on
your premises, and you, in turn, use him to breed just two of your bitches, YOU
might need a USDA license.
12) If you breed no more than one or two litters in a year, but do some private
rescue, fostering, and placement on the side, for which you charge new owners a
modest fee just to help with expenses, YOU
might need a USDA license.
13) If you co-own seven or eight bitches, all close in age, none living with
you, but all are bred in one year, YOU might need a USDA license, even if you
breed infrequently in your own home.
14) If you are a very small hobby breeder & you buy a puppy from a breeder in
CANADA (only a few miles from your home in the US) you might need a USDA
license!
15) If you rescue within the breed you show, and somehow end up with more
unaltered animals than the law allows, you might need a USDA license.
16) If you think "it is not my problem, we should regulate Puppy Mills". . . YOU
might need a USDA license because DORIS DAY ANIMAL LEAGUE vs VENEMAN ANN will be
in Court again and this time DDAL will
WIN!
OPPOSE PAWS! Stop It In Committee!!!!
Call (202) 224-2035

Interesting site,
check it out.....

Cat Fanciers’ Association (CFA) ACTION ALERT
The “Pet Animal Welfare Statute of 2005” (PAWS) SB1139/HB2669
July 14, 2005 Appropriate forwarding is appreciated
The PAWS Bill – BADLY WRITTEN, CONFUSING, COMPLICATED and FULL OF
UNCERTIANTIES!
We urge you to oppose this ill-thought-out legislation that would seriously
impact those who breed pedigreed cats and purebred dogs as well as presenting
unknown consequences for persons taking in stray cats or involved with cat/dog
rescue who receive compensation for placing animals in new homes The PAWS Bill
would require federal licensing and inspection of the private homes of breeders
who do not fall under the established thresholds. Proponents of this bill (the
American Kennel Club, the Humane Society of the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region>, the Doris Day Animal
League) have all referred to PAWS as a step toward “closing a LOOPHOLE in the
Animal Welfare Act. Do not be fooled. This is not some housekeeping change to
correct vagueness in the federal law. This legislation would dramatically alter
the concept of the AWA as established by Congress almost 40 years ago.
Currently the AWA regulates only commercial breeder-dealers who sell
cats/dogs at wholesale, to pet stores, to brokers or are transporters of
animals. PAWS would greatly expand the USDA regulation, including stringent
commercial standards of care, inspections and record keeping, to thousands of
breeders who sell directly, at retail, to buyers of pets. Many cat breeders
would be considered “dealers” under PAWS who have small to moderate sized
breeding catteries with well managed breeding programs that provide fine cats to
smaller or more novice breeders and home-raised pets for a growing number in the
public who want pedigreed kittens/cats as pets.
Just when we thought we understood who was to be licensed according to
PAWS,
the AKC has come out with a new interpretation of the criteria for
exemption:
AKC << Please note also that persons who do not sell at retail the
dogs from fewer than 7 litters, or 25 dogs, whichever is greater, bred or raised
on the sellers own premises, can also sell at retail up to 25 other dogs not
born or raised on the premises before becoming regulated. This would include
dogs fostered through a rescue program. .
In addition to the complete disregard of the fact that CATS are also covered
in this bill – this new interpretation of the PAWS exemption is entirely too
confusing. We do know that there is no “whichever is greater” language in the
Bill; there is no fostering/rescue language in the bill. We also know that 7
litters of kittens per year is not an indication of a large commercial cattery.
TAKE ACTION NOW
It is critical to preserve our cherished breeds and to protect the future of
the cat fancy.
Go to the CFA Website –
www.cfa.org
Read the CFA letter to Senator Santorum, the Sponsor, that was sent to the
Senate Agriculture Subcommittee members to be aware of issues and points you can
make in your own words.
Instructions for contacting these subcommittee members and all the aides for
the Senators on the full Agriculture Committee are on the CFA website.
1. FAX a short letter in opposition to PAWS to the Senate
subcommittee members.
2. EMAIL your opposition to the legislative aides for the full
Agriculture Committee.
Our easy to use preaddressed email takes only a click.
Send a blind copy to
JMillerArt@aol.com so we are aware of your opposition.
Organizations and Clubs – Include a blind copy to rkaneinc@ns.gemlink.com to
be put on the OPPOSITION list that grows daily.
3. Contact your own Senators and Representatives – how to find them
is on the CFA website.
TELL THEM NOT TO BE CO-SPONSORS OF PAWS. If they have already announced as
co-sponsors ask them to WITHDRAW their sponsorship. The Sponsors and
Co-Sponsors are on the CFA website.
Continue to keep informed and watch for further updates and Alerts.
See if your Senator is on the Ag committee
http://agriculture.senate.gov/sen.htm
Take a look at the Animal Advocacy Organizations Opposing PAWS
http://saova.org/1139opponents.html
http://www.dfow.org./paws.htm

Subject:
What IS The Humane Society of the United States?
Please crosspost !
Here is a copy of a great article published last year:
What IS The Humane Society of the United States?
By Christopher Aust
August 2004
I was rather amazed at the number of people who wrote to me about my opinions
regarding the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) when I did my last few
articles. Then again, maybe I shouldn't be. Before
about two weeks ago, I myself was rather ignorant as to the real goals of HSUS,
and where their, (actually your) money goes. As I always do though, I decided to
edumacate myself about them.
I also conducted a poll of 100 average people. Just the average Joe in the
street. 94% of the people thought HSUS ran the local shelters in their
community. 4% knew about their other programs and the remaining 2% had no idea
who they were. Of the 94% all said they would donate to HSUS based on what they
knew about them. I'm betting HSUS is banking, literally, on these types of
individuals.
I also went online and found
some rather interesting, at times quite scary, information on several web sites.
I would have interviewed a HSUS representative, but after last week's
newsletter, I got an email from one that was little more than hate mail and very
offensive!
Founders
Coleman Burke, then president of the American Bible Society, Cleveland Amory and
Helen Jones, founded HSUS in 1954. As far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Burke
served as their President until 1970 when John Hoyt, a Presbyterian minister,
took over as President and CEO until 1996.
Until just a few months ago, the President and CEO was Paul Irwin, a Methodist
minister. The current CEO and President is Wayne Pacelle who admittedly has had
ties with some radical (and I mean radical) animal rights groups in the past.
Now, is it important I mention the religious background? Maybe and maybe not.
What I noticed though is the organization, at least to me, has an evangelical
feel. Is this a bad thing? No. I don't see why unless you are running the
finances in a manner similar to Jim and Tammie Faye Baker! That sure is the way
it looks to me.
Officers and Directors
HSUS is
an organization with their primary focus being animals. As I reviewed the names
and titles of the Board Officers and Directors, I found it curious they had no
DVM's (vets) on either. They have three MDs', three PhDs' and six attorneys. Am
I the only one that finds this odd? Plenty of lawyers, but no vet. Hmmm. Maybe
it's just a typo.
Comparative Financial Operations Report
When I conducted my interview with Kathy Bauch a few weeks ago, she refused to
answer any questions regarding HSUS' finances for a "newsletter." She did offer
to send me their 2003 financials though. This is what they send whenever some
one has questions about their finances. As I mentioned last week, if it was
similar to what they have online, it would be vague and difficult to decipher.
What I got was much more.
What I received is their 2003 Annual Report. It is a twenty-one page "report"
that was obviously very expensive to print. Tucked way in the back is exactly
what I expected. A vague and difficult to read one page financial report. The
rest appears to me to be a very expensive sales letter and nothing more,
complete with a postage paid envelope to send in your donation.
Now you might say, "So what? They have to promote themselves." I agree. However,
this publication has six pages of calendar quality photos of nothing but
animals. Two and a half pages of self-glorifying articles from HSUS staff, none
of which was necessary. How much donor money could have been saved by deleting
this junk from the thousands and thousands of these reports they printed?
According to the Comparative Financial Operations Report for 2003, the HSUS has
$116,205,882.00 in total liability and net assets. Over $5,000,000 of that is in
cash and cash equivalents, and another nearly five and a half million in
receivables. They also have nearly $93,000,000 in market value investments. Not
too bad.
In 2003, in revenue, additions and transfers, HSUS made $76,923,670. Of that
amount, sheltering programs received $10,551,527 and it was shared with animal
habitat and wildlife programs. Now, assuming it was an even split, sheltering
programs received $3,517,175.66
Now that's a lot of money, but not when you consider a good sized shelter can
cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to run, three million is really a
drop in the bucket. They spent $21,145,769.00 in fundraising and membership
development. Six times what they put into their shelter programs, which is what
most people I talked to think HSUS does with the money donated to them.
Providing Help or Selling It
I'm not sure what they spent the money on for their shelter programs, but I will
assure you they didn't fund any shelters. In fact, they charge shelters and
Animal Control offices for their assistance and instructional material. I have
been able to find little and or nothing HSUS doesn't charge for when it comes to
helping a shelter and their educational programs.
For instance, lets say you or your town runs an animal shelter that is
struggling for one reason or another, which most are, HSUS is ready to come in
and help. For between $4000.00 and $20,000.00 they will send their experts to
your shelter through their Animal Services Consultation Program. The fee depends
on the size of the agency and the complexity of its programs, charged on a
sliding scale based on your agency's resources. In other words, the more you
have, the more they'll take.
Youth Programs
Now,
lets go back to our youth. You're in middle or high school and want to start a
club to promote rescue and do things to help companion animals. HSUS can help
you with that, too. Just go to humaneteen.org. There you can buy a package full
of all kinds of propaganda and learn to be a full-fledged animal activist. They
will sell your child a club starter kit for $22.00 and then give activity
suggestions like their "Fight Fur" program.
Here they encourage kids to make flyers and hand them out in front of businesses
to protest against shoppers buying fur. HSUS will also give your child cards to
distribute at such events. They'll show your child pictures of dead animals in
traps and direct them to other sites where they can see pictures of hunters
beating seals over the head.
They will also promote vegen/vegetarian lifestyles to your child. Just go to the
message board for kids and you can read how many of the kids are distressed,
after reading the material HSUS SOLD them, because their parents will not let
them go vegen. You will also see posts promoting PETA!
Now I want to be fair here. They do have some decent material that is age
appropriate and educational in nature. I think it's overpriced; for instance,
your child can rent a video to show their class for $25.00, but some of it is
good material. However, there is little promoting appropriate training, grooming
or responsible ownership of companion animals. It seems to me the whole focus is
turning our children into activists, vegens and extremists.
Now if I want my child to be a vegen, or an activist, I will make that decision
and not HSUS. Our kids have enough on their plate without having to be weighed
down with this information or agenda. Additionally, kids are kids and don't
always make appropriate decisions. When dealing with complex issues like
activism and protesting, it would be easy for them to get into trouble or hurt.
Doesn't PETA target children too?
Ethical
Financial Practices
Let's get back to the money: Former President John Hoyt once instructed his
members on becoming more humane: "We begin, I suggest, by living more simply,
more sparingly." Let's see how he did. He made around $200,000.00 in the late
1980's running HSUS. In 1986, HSUS bought his house in Maryland for $310,000 and
allowed him and his family to live there, free of rent, until 1992. When he
retired as CEO, HSUS gave him a $1,000,000.00 bonus.
Paul Irwin, another former President, while making $300,000.00 from HSUS, was
given an $85,000.00 interest free loan to renovate his cabin in Maine. The cabin
was held in trust by HSUS, however his family continued to use it until he died.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Makes me wonder.
Guilty
by Association
Let's look at some of HSUS' associations: In April of 2000 HSUS sent J.P.
Goodwin as its emissary on an anti-fur mission to China. Goodwin is not just any
animal rights zealot, he was an avowed member of Animal Liberation Front (ALF),
a group once called one of the biggest domestic terrorist organizations by the
FBI. He had been convicted for vandalism of several fur retailers and their
property. Less than a year later, he was formerly identified as a HSUS
legislative staff member.
If you don't know about ALF you should check them out. They truly scare the heck
out of me. They are, in my opinion, every bit as much a threat to people as Al
Quiada. I cannot believe HSUS would hire such a person. When asked questions
about an arson fire at a slaughter house in Petaluma, California, and a Utah
feed co- op that nearly killed a family, Goodwin stated, "We're ecstatic!"
Then,
there is the PETA connection ...
HSUS has repeatedly hired PETA employees in their organization. Their head of
investigations, several investigators, a computer programmer, just to name a
few. Sorry folks, my opinion is, once a terrorist, always a terrorist. When HSUS
hires these people, they appear to support the crimes these individuals may have
been involved in.
In 2003, HSUS VP Martin Stephens was asked to recommend three people to serve on
an EPA "pollution prevention and toxics" panel. Two of his three choices were
PETA employees.
All Talk and No Action
While HSUS will admit they don't run or fund any shelters, you usually find it
at the bottom of the page or tucked away somewhere near the end of a statement.
As I mentioned before, they don't put their money where their mouth is. Get this
.
In 1995, when the Washington DC animal shelter was going to have to close due to
a budget shortfall, HSUS (based in DC) offered to build and operate a DC shelter
at its own expense to serve as a national model. There were, of course,
conditions.
HSUS wanted the city to give it 3-5 acres of land and tax exempt status for all
of its real estate holdings in the District of Columbia. (Remember, they buy
some executives homes to live in among other property holdings.) The DC
government offered a long-term lease but HSUS refused to proceed unless it would
"own absolutely" the land. The district declined, and the only HSUS funded
animal shelter never materialized.
HSUS, who makes and has enough money to fund a shelter in every state, as well
as subsidize spay/neuter programs, declined to help the dogs in its own back
yard. Why? Money is all I can think of. Perhaps they were afraid they would soil
their Armani suits by actually working with a dog.
The New CEO
Rather than go on a tirade about the new President and CEO of HSUS, I have put
some quotes from him below. Read them, and you decide.
"I think they wanted the aggressive approach," he says. "They wanted someone
who was going to think things up. And they got him." June 2004, Washington Post
when asked about his selection as CEO.
"We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations
of human selective breeding." Quoted in Animal People, May, 1993
Overview
I could go on for days about HSUS, but I will stop here. In my opinion, they are
little more than an organization whose main agenda is filling the coffers and
pushing an extremist agenda through misinformation and exploitation. Again, my
opinion, they have done nothing but profit from the contributions of people who
don't know any better. I have tried to see it otherwise, I simply can't.
I highly recommend you go to activistcash.com and see
what they have there about HSUS and their connection with PETA. There are
several other sites I found interesting, as well as many stories about HSUS in
the archive of the Washington Post.
Would I give anything to the Humane Society of the United States? Yes I would. A
pooper-scooper, they can use to go clean my yard. At least then we would know
they actually have done something for a dog this year.
This article may be republished using the following attribution box:
------------
Copyright ©2004 Christopher Aust, Master Dog Trainer & Creator: The Natural
Cooperative Training System (NCTS) for Dogs
The
Instinctual Development System (IDS) for Puppies
Subscribe to the BARK 'n' SCRATCH Newsletter:
subscribe@Master-Dog-Training.com
VISIT NOW:
http://www.Master-Dog-Training.com

This is just the beginning of the end. Read the
forwarded email below.
Jean Nelson has given permission to cross post.
Lesley
From: SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of AvalonKennels@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:05 PM
To: SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com
Cc: FSpitz-L@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: SHOWCOCKERS: your comments
I just received a phone call, actually the man asked for Stephen Nelson.
Since I don't ever talk to telemarketers, I said he was not available.
The man was quite insistent about calling back. I finally convinced him to tell
me what he wanted. He was actually looking for my son, Stephen Nelson, Jr.
He identified himself as from Chase BAnk and the AKC. I told him,my husband
had nothing to do with AKC. He insisted he did. He said,"according to his
records, STephen Nelson had registered a litter of Labradors in 1999." He
proceeded to give me the date of birth, litter #, all details. He was wanting
to sign
him up for a credit card. This invasion of privacy and the selling of private
information is what I foresee if PAWS passes. Will AKC be selling all our
personal info to any and every list they can to make a few bucks?
Permission to forward given.
Jean Nelson
Avalon Kennels
Breeder/owner of over 207
champions
"Draw Close unto the Lord and He will draw close unto you" James 4:8
"For I was hungry and you gave Me food, I was thirsty and you gave Me
drink.
I was a stranger and you welcomed Me....."
Matthew 25:35

I hope you set them straight on who HSUS really
is. Here's a good place to send them:
www.activistcash.com
an online petition on Petition Spot, PAWS 2005 Opposition.
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/pawsoppose

Stop BSL and PAWS or
they will all take us to this place.
The Last Dog on Earth
They were at the door. Her little dog was growling softly. She tried to
hush the sound. She knew what they wanted.
She felt as though her heart was being ripped from her chest. She had
managed to hide her little friend for years. She shared her food and
bed with her. She had bought her on the black market. It had cost her
dearly but it was worth it. She had been so alone. Nothing to love her
or for her to love in return.
Her children had grown up and forgotten her. Her husband had died two
years before she found Sweetie. Sweetie had been a tiny black and tan
ball of fur showing her Yorkshire Terrier background. Of course, she
knew that Sweetie could not been purebred. There had been no purebred
dogs for years. There were few dogs since the breeders had been slowly
and methodically beaten down.
When this first started, everyone sat back and said they could not
possibly be the breeders they were talking about. After all, they loved
their dogs and they were not puppymills. They would never let themselves
be overloaded with dogs. Some of them did not get overloaded nor did
they breed more than a litter or two a year. They were smug and secure
in that only the puppy mills were being raided. The raids were
relentless. They would take place in one state then another.
The dog raiders got smarter with every raid. They learned about
warrants, the court system, the law in different states and they used
whatever means they could to eliminate the breeders of dogs. Some people
thought the raiders were dog lovers trying to save the poor mistreated
puppies.
Some of them were dog lovers, at first. The well-meaning rescue groups
were used. The American Kennel Club was used. They would revoke the
rights of the breeder who was raided. Kennel clubs were infiltrated and
destroyed from within.
The very fibre of the dog world was silently unravelled one string at a
time.
Everyone would rise to arms against every breeder raided. Saying things
like that terrible person mistreated those poor dogs; that person had
too many dogs; and that person is crazy. If the truth were not provoking
enough they would lie and say that person should die. They campaigned
by e-mail, petitioned the courts, and used political pull. Even when
common sense would tell them that they did not know the facts or
circumstances, they persist. They would see fat happy tail wagging dogs
and would say abused dogs. They no longer believed their own eyes.
The dogs tried to tell the truth but no one could hear them.
True, there were cases of abuse, beaten, starved, and sick animals, at
first. Then the tide shifted. Good, honest, dog-loving people started to
be raided. Any reason was used. Dogs were taken and the owners refused
rights to reclaim their dogs. The raiders started to narrow the number
of dogs which were in violation. Any person with a dog became a target.
Dog grooming became a thing of the past. Veterinarian services were
performed out of back room under the dark of night until there were no
veterinarians. Dog shows had long disappeared along with the American
Kennel Club.
Children were told tales of the days when every boy had a dog to run
with through fields. The stories of " Old Shep"," O'Yeller", "Call of
the Wild"," Lassie" and all those wonderful stories which would bring
tears to the eyes of grown men were being forgotten except by a few.
But she remembered as a little girl the small dog who loved her,
followed her everywhere, and gave her comfort like no one on earth could
give. She just had to find her that special warmth, the grateful
lick-kiss, something that loved her unconditional and a reason for
getting up in the morning. She found Sweetie.
Now they were at her door to take the life that she cherished. The warm
little black and tan 3-pound body that loved her as much as she loved
it.
And there was no one to stop them.
