The PAWS Bill
Home • Setup Prices • Search Ranches • Contact Information • Seller Fraud Alert • Reflection • The PAWS Bill • Mollman Carriage Services • Transfer Factor • GojiBerry • FrequenSea • American Culture Dakota Gold Paint & QHs Dworshak Quarter Horses   Mollman Farm Sporthorses SJ Dakota Bobtails Sund Pets Triple-M Kennel Ron Paul 2008 - Hope For America

ON THIS PAGE I WILL POST EVERY POST, CROSSPOST THAT COMES MY WAY REGARDING THE PAWS BILL.  Links on this page could take you all over the internet!

OPPOSE PAWS!!!  This is not a bill written just for "puppy mills"!  This bill CAN INCLUDE YOU!!!!

 

WILL YOU FALL UNDER PAWS LEGISLATION?

TAKE THE TEST

bullet Explanation of the logic flowchart behind this test.
bullet proposed USDA regulation
bulletDFOW info site    
bulletPet-Law.com
bulletThe 4% AKC Myth must-read
bulletDealer Defined easy-format version

RETURN TO BEGINNING OF TEST

The list of organizations opposed to Paws is growing daily. If you
still have any doubts about whether or not this legislation will
harm you as a hobby breeder or part of your breed rescue, then I
urge you to stop believing everything you hear and go get yourself
educated quickly because time is running out. There is a list of
scenarios below you might want to read.

There has been a definite clarification that Rescue will be
impacted. Big time. Here are some websites that you can go to and
read:

_
http://ncraoa.com/alerts.html(http://ncraoa.com/alerts.html )

_
http://www.dfow.org/paws.htm

_www.pet-law.com_ (
http://www.pet-law.com)   (click  on the PAWS
links on the
left side)

_
http://saova.org/1139.html(http://saova.org/1139.html )

Organizations OPPOSED to PAWS as of this moment:

Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council
Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance
Virginia Hunting Dog Owners' Association
Cat Fanciers' Association
The Animal Council
National Animal Interest Alliance
American Dog Owners' Association
United Kennel Club
Master of Fox Hounds Association
American Brittany Club
The International Cat Association
American Shetland Sheepdog Association
Dog Federation of Wisconsin
California Federation of Dog Clubs
North Carolina Federation of Dog Clubs
Missouri Federation of Animal Owners
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (Texas)
North Carolina Responsible Animal Owners' Alliance
Carolina Kennel Club, Inc. (NC)
Alliance of Responsible Pet Owners of N.E. Florida
North Carolina Coon Hunters Association
North Carolina Sporting Dogs Association
North Carolina Bear Hunters Association
Greater Clark County Kennel Club (WA)
Schooley's Mountain Kennel Club (NJ)
American Dog Breeders Association
American Chesapeake Club
Ladies' Dog Club, Inc. (MA)
Asheville Kennel Club (NC)
Jacksonville NC Kennel Club
The International Bengal Cat Society
Central Carolina Dachshund Club (NC)
Turkish Van Breed Rescue
Greater Orange Park Dog Club, Inc (FL)
Lhasa Apso Southern Rescue, Inc. (MS)
Clermont County Kennel Club (OH)
U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance
Great Dane Rescue of Northeast Florida
Piedmont Kennel Club (NC)
The Dalmatian Club of the Piedmont (NC)
German Shorthaired Pointer Club of America
Jacksonville Sheltie Rescue (FL)
Federation of Maine Dog Clubs
Springfield Kennel Club (MA)
Virginia Bear Hunters Association
American Pomeranian Club
Responsible Animal Owners of Tennessee
North American Shar-Pei Rescue
Burlington Cat Fanciers (NC)
Tropical Cats Inc. (FL)

Jacksonville Dog Fanciers Association (FL)
National Birman Fanciers (CFA)
Birman Breed Rescue
Susquehanna Brittany Club (PA)
New England Sheltie Rescue
Salisbury Kennel Club (NC)
LNC Pet Supply (CA)
Devon Rex Rescue League, Inc.
Animal Safe Haven Foundation (CA)
Memphis International Cat Enthusiasts (TN)
PUFF (Pfanciers United For Fun, Inc.) (Midwest)
North Carolina Field Trial Association
CT Dogs (CT)
Bay Area Boxer Rescue (CA)
Massachusetts Federation of Dog Clubs
East of Eden Cat Fanciers (CA)
Dalmatian Rescue of Southwest Virginia
Colonial Shetland Sheepdog Club (MA)
CFA Purebred Rescue, Inc.
Western Massachusetts Shetland Sheepdog Club
Greater Fort Myers Dog Club (FL)
Capitol City Cocker Club (DC)
Missouri Pet Breeders Association
White Shetland Sheepdog Association
KitnHevn Rescue, Inc. (FL & OH)
Sunshine Dachshund Club of Jacksonville (FL)
Halfpint Haven Borzoi and Greyhound Rescue, Inc. (FL)

Western Clinton Sportsmen's Association (PA)
New Brunswick Kennel Club (NJ)
Papillion Club of America
Illinois Federation of Outdoor Resources
North Shore Kennel Club (MA)
Professional Pet Association (MO)
Sporting Dog Association of Missouri
Dachshund Club of America
Thunderkatz, Inc. (OK)
Wachusett Kennel Club (MA)
St. Croix Valley Brittany Club (MN)
Pug Rescue of North Carolina, Inc.
Kalamazoo Kennel Club (MI)
Wisconsin Cocker Rescue
Fanciers Cocker Spaniel Club of Southern WI

The Yorkshire Terrier Cub of America!! Yorkies are the fifth most numerous breed in AKC registrations

German Shorthaired Pointer Club of Central Virginia

 Triangle Shetland Sheepdog Club of North Carolina

Harmony Bay Chinese Shar-Pei Club (WA)

 Sussex Hills Kennel Club (NJ

Prairie State Cat Club (IL, IN & MI)

YOU MIGHT NEED A USDA LICENSE IF:

1) If you sell that stud fee puppy that just didn't turn out the way you wanted-- guess what you are a third party/broker and you might need a USDA license.

2) You already bred 2 of your bitches and there are 17 puppies on the ground and registered. That darn bitch you co-own just had 12 puppies ---- you might need a USDA license.

3) If you are a handler and you come back from Crufts with dogs purchased for your clients YOU might need a USDA license.

4) If you are a handler and your clients bring their litters to you to sell YOU might need a USDA license

5) If you are that breeder who had their handler sell your puppies, your handler must turn you in and YOU might need a USDA license

6) If you have great lines and want to sell your dogs to another show/breeder (even part interest) YOU might need a USDA license

7) If you don't alter your puppies before they leave and one of your pet puppies is bred you just sold breeding stock and YOU might need a USDA license

8) If "oops" you sell an Irish Wolfhound and his new owner actually uses the breed to hunt You just sold a hunting dog and YOU might need a USDA license

9) If you breed just one litter in a year, but decide to sell one or two of your retired show dogs, YOU might need a USDA license.

10) If your breeding partner, who co-owns all your queen cats with you, breeds and raises more than three litters in one year in her home and you do the same in your home, YOU BOTH might need USDA
licenses.

11) If your popular stud dog breeds five bitches belonging to other breeders, on your premises, and you, in turn, use him to breed just two of your bitches, YOU might need a USDA license.

12) If you breed no more than one or two litters in a year, but do some private rescue, fostering, and placement on the side, for which you charge new owners a modest fee just to help with expenses, YOU
might need a USDA license.

13) If you co-own seven or eight bitches, all close in age, none living with you, but all are bred in one year, YOU might need a USDA license, even if you breed infrequently in your own home.

14) If you are a very small hobby breeder & you buy a puppy from a breeder in CANADA (only a few miles from your home in the US) you might need a USDA license!

15) If you rescue within the breed you show, and somehow end up with more unaltered animals than the law allows, you might need a USDA license.

16) If you think "it is not my problem, we should regulate Puppy Mills". . . YOU might need a USDA license because DORIS DAY ANIMAL LEAGUE vs VENEMAN ANN will be in Court again and this time DDAL will
WIN!

OPPOSE PAWS! Stop It In Committee!!!!
Call (202) 224-2035

Interesting site, check it out.....
 

Cat Fanciers’ Association (CFA) ACTION ALERT

The “Pet Animal Welfare Statute of 2005” (PAWS) SB1139/HB2669

July 14, 2005   Appropriate forwarding is appreciated

The PAWS Bill – BADLY WRITTEN, CONFUSING, COMPLICATED and FULL OF UNCERTIANTIES!

We urge you to oppose this ill-thought-out legislation that would seriously impact those who breed pedigreed cats and purebred dogs as well as presenting unknown consequences for persons taking in stray cats or involved with cat/dog rescue who receive compensation for placing animals in new homes  The PAWS Bill would require federal licensing and inspection of the private homes of breeders who do not fall under the established thresholds.  Proponents  of this bill (the American Kennel Club, the Humane Society of the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region>, the Doris Day Animal League) have all referred to PAWS as a step toward “closing a LOOPHOLE in the Animal Welfare Act.  Do not be fooled. This is not some housekeeping change to correct vagueness in the federal law.  This legislation would dramatically alter the concept of the AWA as established by Congress almost 40 years ago. 

Currently the AWA regulates only commercial breeder-dealers who sell cats/dogs at wholesale, to pet stores, to brokers or are transporters of animals.  PAWS would greatly expand the USDA regulation, including stringent commercial standards of care, inspections and record keeping, to thousands of breeders who sell directly, at retail, to buyers of pets.  Many cat breeders would be considered “dealers” under PAWS who have small to moderate sized breeding catteries with well managed breeding programs that provide fine cats to smaller or more novice breeders and home-raised pets for a growing number in the public who want pedigreed kittens/cats as pets.

Just when we thought we understood who was to be licensed according to PAWS,

the AKC has come out with a new interpretation of the criteria for exemption: 

AKC << Please note also that persons who do not sell at retail the dogs from fewer than 7 litters, or 25 dogs, whichever is greater, bred or raised on the sellers own premises, can also sell at retail up to 25 other dogs not born or raised on the premises before becoming regulated.  This would include dogs fostered through a rescue program. .

In addition to the complete disregard of the fact that CATS are also covered in this bill – this new interpretation of the PAWS exemption is entirely too confusing.  We do know that there is no “whichever is greater” language in the Bill; there is no fostering/rescue language in the bill.  We also know that 7 litters of kittens per year is not an indication of a large commercial cattery.

 

bulletCat reproduction is different from that of dogs.  Breeders have few choices if their cats come in heat constantly – they must consider the health and condition of their cats.  Females often have litters spaced 8 or 9 months apart.  Therefore, fanciers with as few as 4 or 5 females may have to be federally licensed.
bulletThe AWA regulates persons who in “commerce”, as defined in federal law, sell dogs/cats “for compensation OR profit”.  Whether a cat/dog is transferred as compensation for stud service, for an “adoption fee”, for reimbursed expenses, for a donation or for a purchase price - this is a <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">SALE</st1:place></st1:City>.  There is nothing in PAWS that gives authority to exclude rescue groups or fostering individuals who place pets regardless of whether they are for profit or non-profit if they receive any “compensation”. 
bulletPAWS would greatly overextend the capacity of the US Department of Agriculture.  This legislation would add to the existing 3000 Class A Dealers an estimated 5000 AKC breeders and 1200 Cat Fanciers’ Association breeders as dealers to be regulated in addition to those who register cats/dogs with other associations and a completely uncertain number of rescuers or breeders who may not register with any association but still sell cats/dogs.

TAKE ACTION NOW

It is critical to preserve our cherished breeds and to protect the future of the cat fancy.

Go to the CFA Website – www.cfa.org

Read the CFA letter to Senator Santorum, the Sponsor, that was sent to the Senate Agriculture Subcommittee members to be aware of issues and points you can make in your own words.

Instructions for contacting these subcommittee members and all the aides for the Senators on the full Agriculture Committee are on the CFA website.

1.         FAX a short letter in opposition to PAWS to the Senate subcommittee members.

2.         EMAIL your opposition to the legislative aides for the full Agriculture Committee. 

Our easy to use preaddressed email takes only a click. 

Send a  blind copy to JMillerArt@aol.com  so we are aware of  your  opposition.

Organizations and Clubs – Include a blind copy to rkaneinc@ns.gemlink.com to be put on the OPPOSITION list that grows daily.

3.         Contact your own Senators and Representatives – how to find them is on the CFA website. 

TELL THEM NOT TO BE CO-SPONSORS OF PAWS.  If they have already announced as co-sponsors ask them to WITHDRAW their sponsorship.  The Sponsors and Co-Sponsors are on the CFA website.

Continue to keep informed and watch for further updates and Alerts.

See if your Senator is on the Ag committee http://agriculture.senate.gov/sen.htm  

Take a look at the Animal Advocacy Organizations Opposing PAWS  http://saova.org/1139opponents.html  

http://www.dfow.org./paws.htm

Subject: What IS The Humane Society of the United States?
Please crosspost !

 Here is a copy of a great article published last year:

 What IS The Humane Society of the United States?
By Christopher Aust
August 2004

I was rather amazed at the number of people who wrote to me about my opinions regarding the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) when I did my last few articles. Then again, maybe I shouldn't be. Before
about two weeks ago, I myself was rather ignorant as to the real goals of HSUS, and where their, (actually your) money goes. As I always do though, I decided to edumacate myself about them.

I also conducted a poll of 100 average people. Just the average Joe in the street. 94% of the people thought HSUS ran the local shelters in their community. 4% knew about their other programs and the remaining 2% had no idea who they were. Of the 94% all said they would donate to HSUS based on what they knew about them. I'm betting HSUS is banking, literally, on these types of individuals.

I also went online and found some rather interesting, at times quite scary, information on several web sites. I would have interviewed a HSUS representative, but after last week's newsletter, I got an email from one that was little more than hate mail and very offensive!

Founders

Coleman Burke, then president of the American Bible Society, Cleveland Amory and Helen Jones, founded HSUS in 1954. As far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Burke served as their President until 1970 when John Hoyt, a Presbyterian minister, took over as President and CEO until 1996.

Until just a few months ago, the President and CEO was Paul Irwin, a Methodist minister. The current CEO and President is Wayne Pacelle who admittedly has had ties with some radical (and I mean radical) animal rights groups in the past.

Now, is it important I mention the religious background? Maybe and maybe not. What I noticed though is the organization, at least to me, has an evangelical feel. Is this a bad thing? No. I don't see why unless you are running the finances in a manner similar to Jim and Tammie Faye Baker! That sure is the way it looks to me.

Officers and Directors
 

HSUS is an organization with their primary focus being animals. As I reviewed the names and titles of the Board Officers and Directors, I found it curious they had no DVM's (vets) on either. They have three MDs', three PhDs' and six attorneys. Am I the only one that finds this odd? Plenty of lawyers, but no vet. Hmmm. Maybe it's just a typo.

Comparative Financial Operations Report

When I conducted my interview with Kathy Bauch a few weeks ago, she refused to answer any questions regarding HSUS' finances for a "newsletter." She did offer to send me their 2003 financials though. This is what they send whenever some one has questions about their finances. As I mentioned last week, if it was similar to what they have online, it would be vague and difficult to decipher. What I got was much more.

What I received is their 2003 Annual Report. It is a twenty-one page "report" that was obviously very expensive to print. Tucked way in the back is exactly what I expected. A vague and difficult to read one page financial report. The rest appears to me to be a very expensive sales letter and nothing more, complete with a postage paid envelope to send in your donation.

Now you might say, "So what? They have to promote themselves." I agree. However, this publication has six pages of calendar quality photos of nothing but animals. Two and a half pages of self-glorifying articles from HSUS staff, none of which was necessary. How much donor money could have been saved by deleting this junk from the thousands and thousands of these reports they printed?

According to the Comparative Financial Operations Report for 2003, the HSUS has $116,205,882.00 in total liability and net assets. Over $5,000,000 of that is in cash and cash equivalents, and another nearly five and a half million in receivables. They also have nearly $93,000,000 in market value investments. Not too bad.

In 2003, in revenue, additions and transfers, HSUS made $76,923,670. Of that amount, sheltering programs received $10,551,527 and it was shared with animal habitat and wildlife programs. Now, assuming it was an even split, sheltering programs received $3,517,175.66

Now that's a lot of money, but not when you consider a good sized shelter can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to run, three million is really a drop in the bucket. They spent $21,145,769.00 in fundraising and membership development. Six times what they put into their shelter programs, which is what most people I talked to think HSUS does with the money donated to them.

Providing Help or Selling It

I'm not sure what they spent the money on for their shelter programs, but I will assure you they didn't fund any shelters. In fact, they charge shelters and Animal Control offices for their assistance and instructional material. I have been able to find little and or nothing HSUS doesn't charge for when it comes to helping a shelter and their educational programs.

For instance, lets say you or your town runs an animal shelter that is struggling for one reason or another, which most are, HSUS is ready to come in and help. For between $4000.00 and $20,000.00 they will send their experts to your shelter through their Animal Services Consultation Program. The fee depends on the size of the agency and the complexity of its programs, charged on a sliding scale based on your agency's resources. In other words, the more you have, the more they'll take.

Youth Programs
 

Now, lets go back to our youth. You're in middle or high school and want to start a club to promote rescue and do things to help companion animals. HSUS can help you with that, too. Just go to humaneteen.org. There you can buy a package full of all kinds of propaganda and learn to be a full-fledged animal activist. They will sell your child a club starter kit for $22.00 and then give activity suggestions like their "Fight Fur" program.

Here they encourage kids to make flyers and hand them out in front of businesses to protest against shoppers buying fur. HSUS will also give your child cards to distribute at such events. They'll show your child pictures of dead animals in traps and direct them to other sites where they can see pictures of hunters beating seals over the head.

They will also promote vegen/vegetarian lifestyles to your child. Just go to the message board for kids and you can read how many of the kids are distressed, after reading the material HSUS SOLD them, because their parents will not let them go vegen. You will also see posts promoting PETA!

Now I want to be fair here. They do have some decent material that is age appropriate and educational in nature. I think it's overpriced; for instance, your child can rent a video to show their class for $25.00, but some of it is good material. However, there is little promoting appropriate training, grooming or responsible ownership of companion animals. It seems to me the whole focus is turning  our children into activists, vegens and extremists.

Now if I want my child to be a vegen, or an activist, I will make that decision and not HSUS. Our kids have enough on their plate without having to be weighed down with this information or agenda. Additionally, kids are kids and don't always make appropriate decisions. When dealing with complex issues like activism and  protesting, it would be easy for them to get into trouble or hurt. Doesn't PETA target children too?
 

Ethical Financial Practices

Let's get back to the money: Former President John Hoyt once instructed his members on becoming more humane: "We begin, I suggest, by living more simply, more sparingly." Let's see how he did. He made around $200,000.00 in the late 1980's running HSUS. In 1986, HSUS bought his house in Maryland for $310,000 and allowed him and his family to live there, free of rent, until 1992. When he retired as CEO, HSUS gave him a $1,000,000.00 bonus.

Paul Irwin, another former President, while making $300,000.00 from HSUS, was given an $85,000.00 interest free loan to renovate his cabin in Maine. The cabin was held in trust by HSUS, however his family continued to use it until he died. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Makes me wonder.
 

Guilty by Association

Let's look at some of HSUS' associations: In April of 2000 HSUS sent J.P. Goodwin as its emissary on an anti-fur mission to China. Goodwin is not just any animal rights zealot, he was an avowed member of Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a group once called one of the biggest domestic terrorist organizations by the FBI. He had been convicted for vandalism of several fur retailers and their property. Less than a year later, he was formerly identified as a HSUS legislative staff member.

If you don't know about ALF you should check them out. They truly scare the heck out of me. They are, in my opinion, every bit as much a threat to people as Al Quiada. I cannot believe HSUS would hire such a person. When asked questions about an arson fire at a slaughter house in Petaluma, California, and a Utah feed co- op that nearly killed a family, Goodwin stated, "We're ecstatic!"
 

Then, there is the PETA connection ...

HSUS has repeatedly hired PETA employees in their organization. Their head of investigations, several investigators, a computer programmer, just to name a few. Sorry folks, my opinion is, once a terrorist, always a terrorist. When HSUS hires these people, they appear to support the crimes these individuals may have been involved in.

In 2003, HSUS VP Martin Stephens was asked to recommend three people to serve on an EPA "pollution prevention and toxics" panel. Two of his three choices were PETA employees.

All Talk and No Action

While HSUS will admit they don't run or fund any shelters, you usually find it at the bottom of the page or tucked away somewhere near the end of a statement. As I mentioned before, they don't put their money where their mouth is. Get this .

In 1995, when the Washington DC animal shelter was going to have to close due to a budget shortfall, HSUS (based in DC) offered to build and operate a DC shelter at its own expense to serve as a national model. There were, of course, conditions.

HSUS wanted the city to give it 3-5 acres of land and tax exempt status for all of its real estate holdings in the District of Columbia.  (Remember, they buy some executives homes to live in among other property holdings.) The DC government offered a long-term lease but HSUS refused to proceed unless it would "own absolutely" the land. The district declined, and the only HSUS funded animal shelter never materialized.

HSUS, who makes and has enough money to fund a shelter in every state, as well as subsidize spay/neuter programs, declined to help the dogs in its own back yard. Why? Money is all I can think of. Perhaps they were afraid they would soil their Armani suits by actually working with a dog.

The New CEO

Rather than go on a tirade about the new President and CEO of HSUS, I have put some quotes from him below. Read them, and you decide.
 "I think they wanted the aggressive approach," he says. "They wanted someone who was going to think things up. And they got him." June 2004, Washington Post when asked about his selection as CEO.

"We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Quoted in Animal People, May, 1993

Overview

I could go on for days about HSUS, but I will stop here. In my opinion, they are little more than an organization whose main agenda is filling the coffers and pushing an extremist agenda through misinformation and exploitation. Again, my opinion, they have done nothing but profit from the contributions of people who don't know any better. I have tried to see it otherwise, I simply can't.

I highly recommend you go to activistcash.com and see what they have there about HSUS and their connection with PETA. There are several other sites I found interesting, as well as many stories about HSUS in the archive of the Washington Post.

Would I give anything to the Humane Society of the United States? Yes I would. A pooper-scooper, they can use to go clean my yard. At least then we would know they actually have done something for a dog this year.

This article may be republished using the following attribution box:
------------
Copyright ©2004 Christopher Aust, Master Dog Trainer & Creator: The Natural Cooperative Training System (NCTS) for Dogs

The Instinctual Development System (IDS) for Puppies
Subscribe to the BARK 'n' SCRATCH Newsletter:
subscribe@Master-Dog-Training.com
VISIT NOW: http://www.Master-Dog-Training.com

This is just the beginning of the end. Read the forwarded email below.
Jean Nelson has given permission to cross post.
Lesley


From: SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com

[mailto:SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of AvalonKennels@aol.com
  Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:05 PM
  To: SHOWCOCKERS@yahoogroups.com
  Cc: FSpitz-L@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: SHOWCOCKERS: your comments


  I just received a phone call, actually the man asked for Stephen Nelson.
  Since I don't ever talk to telemarketers, I said he was not available.
The man was quite insistent about calling back.  I finally convinced him to tell
me what he wanted.  He was actually looking for my son, Stephen Nelson, Jr.
He identified himself as from Chase BAnk and the AKC. I told him,my husband
had nothing to do with AKC.  He insisted he did.  He said,"according to his
records, STephen Nelson had registered a litter of Labradors in 1999."  He
proceeded to give me the date of birth, litter #, all details.  He was wanting to sign
him up for a credit card.  This invasion of privacy and the selling of private
  information is what I foresee if PAWS passes.  Will AKC be selling all our
  personal info to any and every list they can to make a few bucks?


  Permission to forward given.


  Jean Nelson
  Avalon Kennels
  Breeder/owner of over 207
  champions
  "Draw Close unto the Lord and He will draw close unto you" James 4:8

  "For I was hungry and you gave Me food, I was thirsty and you gave Me
drink.
  I was a stranger and you welcomed Me....."
          Matthew 25:35
 

I hope you set them straight on who HSUS really is.  Here's a good place to send them:
 
www.activistcash.com

an online petition on Petition Spot, PAWS 2005 Opposition.

http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/pawsoppose

Stop BSL and PAWS or they will all take us to this place.

The Last Dog on Earth

They were at the door. Her little dog was growling softly. She tried to  hush the sound. She knew what they wanted.

She felt as though her heart was  being ripped from her chest. She had managed to hide her little friend for  years. She shared her food and bed with her. She had bought her on the black  market. It had cost her dearly but it was worth it. She had been so alone. Nothing to love her or for her to love in return. 

Her children had grown up and forgotten her. Her husband had died two years before she found Sweetie. Sweetie had been a tiny black and tan ball of  fur showing her Yorkshire Terrier background. Of course, she knew that Sweetie could not been purebred. There had been no purebred dogs for years. There were few dogs since the breeders had been slowly and methodically beaten down.

When this first started, everyone sat back and said they could not  possibly be the breeders they were talking about. After all, they loved their dogs and they were not puppymills. They would never let themselves be overloaded with dogs. Some of them did not get overloaded nor did they breed more than a litter or two a year. They were smug and secure in that only the  puppy mills were being raided. The raids were relentless. They would take place in one state then  another.

The dog raiders got smarter with every raid. They learned about warrants, the court system, the law in different states and they used whatever means they could to eliminate the breeders of dogs. Some people thought the raiders were dog lovers trying to save the poor mistreated puppies.

Some of them were dog lovers, at first. The well-meaning rescue groups were used. The American Kennel Club was used. They would revoke the rights of the breeder who was raided. Kennel clubs were infiltrated and destroyed from within.

The very fibre of the dog world was silently unravelled one string  at a time.

Everyone would rise to arms against every breeder raided. Saying things  like that terrible person mistreated those poor dogs; that person had too many dogs; and that person is crazy. If the truth were not provoking enough  they would lie and say that person should die. They campaigned by e-mail, petitioned the courts, and used political pull. Even when common sense  would tell them that they did not know the facts or circumstances, they persist. They would see fat happy tail wagging dogs and would say abused dogs. They no longer believed their own eyes.

The dogs tried to tell the truth but no one could hear them.

True, there were cases of abuse, beaten, starved, and sick animals, at  first. Then the tide shifted. Good, honest, dog-loving people started to be raided. Any reason was used. Dogs were taken and the owners refused rights to reclaim their dogs. The raiders started to narrow the number of dogs which were in violation. Any person with a dog became a target. Dog  grooming became a thing of the past. Veterinarian services were performed out of  back room under the dark of night until there were no veterinarians. Dog shows had long disappeared along with the American Kennel Club.

Children were  told tales of the days when every boy had a dog to run with through fields. The stories of " Old Shep"," O'Yeller", "Call of the Wild"," Lassie" and all those wonderful stories which would bring tears to the eyes of grown men were being forgotten except by a few.

But she remembered as a little girl the small dog who loved her, followed her everywhere, and gave her comfort like no one on earth could give. She just had to find her that special warmth, the grateful lick-kiss,  something that loved her unconditional and a reason for getting up in the morning.  She found Sweetie.

Now they were at her door to take the life that she cherished. The warm little black and tan 3-pound body that loved her as much as she loved it.

And there was no one to stop them.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter

 

Views, advertising, opinions are not necessarily that of everyone at dakotaeranch.com because of the diverse members.

© Copyright 2002 - 2008 all rights reserved on personal photos and text!

Dakota e Ranch.com and Ranch owners